CaseyD
10-16-2007, 09:01 PM
This is assignment number two for my English class: write a two-paged comparing/contrasting essay on any topic. One of the requirements my teacher did give me, however, was that the essay must be written from our existing knowledge and past experiences. Keeping that in mind, I tried many different ideas, but only the comparison and contrast between Straw burning and Wood/Coal burning boilers topic had enough to meet the criteria. Here it is, and I hope it manages to both entertain and inform!
PS--I could use some pictures of a straw burning engine - I don't happen to have any :O
Even though all high-pressure boilers simply heat water above its boiling point, there are very many different ways that the fire is used. The two most common types of boilers on steam traction engines burn either coal and wood or straw. They are similar in the way the fire itself is used, but the ways the fire is controlled and fed are different.
http://i160.photobucket.com/albums/t199/caseyd11/rollag/boiler1.gif
A basic locomotive-type boiler, the same design used for steam tractors. Note the brick arch in the rear of the firebox.
A wood and coal burning firebox is built much simpler then a straw burner, because the fire will not be pulled up the smokestack. It is simply a small room that has cast-iron grates with slotted holes for a floor and a metal door for adding fuel and tending the fire. The door can be opened at any time, although the fire's draft will pull cold, unburnt air over the fire instead of through the fire, heating it better and more evenly.
http://i160.photobucket.com/albums/t199/caseyd11/rollag/100_2212l.jpg
Here is the view of the fire that powers a coal-fed traction engine. This engine, as far as I know, has a foot pedal on the floor to enable the doors to be opened hands free, and to slam shut once the coal is scattered onto the fire.
Burning enough straw to create steam is quite difficult compared to a solid-fuel fire. Inside the straw burning firebox, there is a firebrick arch covering the flues to prevent large pieces being carried out with the smoke. The arch is a metal baffle that protrudes from the rear, bottom corner of the firebox at a 45 degree angle that has firebricks covering it. The fire door is very unique, too. Instead of just being a solid steel door, the door has a funnel-shaped chute in the middle of it that is used to force straw in continuously. With that design, the door is never really opened, it is just made up in part of the straw being pushed through it.
http://i160.photobucket.com/albums/t199/caseyd11/rollag/100_2159.jpg
A horse-drawn Case steam engine. Although this one burns wood, most early horse drawn engines like this would be able to burn straw. They were transported between threshing jobs over great lengths, so self-propulsion wouldn't have been practical. Since they were already in the field separating grain from the stalk, it makes sense that many were straw burning.
Another simple difference is the way the fuel is stored. Most coal burning engines have hoppers with slots in the bottom for easy access on the rear of the engine. Wood burning tractors can be similar, with a place to stack wood on the rear platform. If the engine is in for hard work or long travel, however, a wagon loaded with wood will be more appropriate. Straw burning tractors always need a hay wagon, though. This is because the fire needs large amounts of straw even if the engine is not being worked very hard, due to how little heat energy is in the straw. For that reason, most early steam tractors were also outfitted to be pulled by horses, even though they might have been self propelled.
http://i160.photobucket.com/albums/t199/caseyd11/rollag/100_3167.jpg
A road train setup, with both water tender and wood bunker being pulled by the tractor.
http://i160.photobucket.com/albums/t199/caseyd11/rollag/100_2185l.jpg
Another traction engine with a tender behind it. This is a 1/2 scale model of a Case steam traction engine that is meant to burn coal primarily.
After the wood, coal, or straw is burnt up in its own special way, the exhaust gas from the fire is used the same way. All of it is carried through horizontal pipes that are submerged in water. The water then absorbs the heat from the fire, creating steam pressure after the water becomes hotter than it's boiling point. One special consideration in the cleaning aspect of a straw burning boiler is that glass may begin to form on the inside of the horizontal pipes, because of the high silica content in straw.
http://i160.photobucket.com/albums/t199/caseyd11/rollag/100_2237.jpg
This is the smokebox end of the flues. Fire is carried from the firebox, though them, and pushed out of the smoke stack by exhaust steam coming out of the pipe in the upper righthand corner.
After a closer analysis, it is apparent that these two different types of boilers are not very different at all: they just use a different technique to make steam. Just as each person in the world has different passions and skills, each of these boilers have their ideal applications. For example, it would not make sense to have a straw burning boiler in a sawmill, or a wood burning boiler out in the middle of the vast plains of the American Midwest. This just illustrates the long-known fact that there is no single, correct answer to any problem or question.
http://i160.photobucket.com/albums/t199/caseyd11/rollag/100_2239.jpg
This is the quote that sits above the Villuam-Corliss stationary engine out on Steamer Hill. There is an entire discussion just on this quote in the Stationary Steam Photos (http://www.wmstrcommunityforum.com/showthread.php?t=117)
thread.
PS--I could use some pictures of a straw burning engine - I don't happen to have any :O
Even though all high-pressure boilers simply heat water above its boiling point, there are very many different ways that the fire is used. The two most common types of boilers on steam traction engines burn either coal and wood or straw. They are similar in the way the fire itself is used, but the ways the fire is controlled and fed are different.
http://i160.photobucket.com/albums/t199/caseyd11/rollag/boiler1.gif
A basic locomotive-type boiler, the same design used for steam tractors. Note the brick arch in the rear of the firebox.
A wood and coal burning firebox is built much simpler then a straw burner, because the fire will not be pulled up the smokestack. It is simply a small room that has cast-iron grates with slotted holes for a floor and a metal door for adding fuel and tending the fire. The door can be opened at any time, although the fire's draft will pull cold, unburnt air over the fire instead of through the fire, heating it better and more evenly.
http://i160.photobucket.com/albums/t199/caseyd11/rollag/100_2212l.jpg
Here is the view of the fire that powers a coal-fed traction engine. This engine, as far as I know, has a foot pedal on the floor to enable the doors to be opened hands free, and to slam shut once the coal is scattered onto the fire.
Burning enough straw to create steam is quite difficult compared to a solid-fuel fire. Inside the straw burning firebox, there is a firebrick arch covering the flues to prevent large pieces being carried out with the smoke. The arch is a metal baffle that protrudes from the rear, bottom corner of the firebox at a 45 degree angle that has firebricks covering it. The fire door is very unique, too. Instead of just being a solid steel door, the door has a funnel-shaped chute in the middle of it that is used to force straw in continuously. With that design, the door is never really opened, it is just made up in part of the straw being pushed through it.
http://i160.photobucket.com/albums/t199/caseyd11/rollag/100_2159.jpg
A horse-drawn Case steam engine. Although this one burns wood, most early horse drawn engines like this would be able to burn straw. They were transported between threshing jobs over great lengths, so self-propulsion wouldn't have been practical. Since they were already in the field separating grain from the stalk, it makes sense that many were straw burning.
Another simple difference is the way the fuel is stored. Most coal burning engines have hoppers with slots in the bottom for easy access on the rear of the engine. Wood burning tractors can be similar, with a place to stack wood on the rear platform. If the engine is in for hard work or long travel, however, a wagon loaded with wood will be more appropriate. Straw burning tractors always need a hay wagon, though. This is because the fire needs large amounts of straw even if the engine is not being worked very hard, due to how little heat energy is in the straw. For that reason, most early steam tractors were also outfitted to be pulled by horses, even though they might have been self propelled.
http://i160.photobucket.com/albums/t199/caseyd11/rollag/100_3167.jpg
A road train setup, with both water tender and wood bunker being pulled by the tractor.
http://i160.photobucket.com/albums/t199/caseyd11/rollag/100_2185l.jpg
Another traction engine with a tender behind it. This is a 1/2 scale model of a Case steam traction engine that is meant to burn coal primarily.
After the wood, coal, or straw is burnt up in its own special way, the exhaust gas from the fire is used the same way. All of it is carried through horizontal pipes that are submerged in water. The water then absorbs the heat from the fire, creating steam pressure after the water becomes hotter than it's boiling point. One special consideration in the cleaning aspect of a straw burning boiler is that glass may begin to form on the inside of the horizontal pipes, because of the high silica content in straw.
http://i160.photobucket.com/albums/t199/caseyd11/rollag/100_2237.jpg
This is the smokebox end of the flues. Fire is carried from the firebox, though them, and pushed out of the smoke stack by exhaust steam coming out of the pipe in the upper righthand corner.
After a closer analysis, it is apparent that these two different types of boilers are not very different at all: they just use a different technique to make steam. Just as each person in the world has different passions and skills, each of these boilers have their ideal applications. For example, it would not make sense to have a straw burning boiler in a sawmill, or a wood burning boiler out in the middle of the vast plains of the American Midwest. This just illustrates the long-known fact that there is no single, correct answer to any problem or question.
http://i160.photobucket.com/albums/t199/caseyd11/rollag/100_2239.jpg
This is the quote that sits above the Villuam-Corliss stationary engine out on Steamer Hill. There is an entire discussion just on this quote in the Stationary Steam Photos (http://www.wmstrcommunityforum.com/showthread.php?t=117)
thread.