Minnesota Operator's License

ICLIDA

Mega Poster
WMSTR Lifetime Member
The Minnesota Steam Engine Association (MSEA) has been working with our Minnesota Chief Boiler Inspector, Joel Amato, about establishing reciprocity with other jurisdictions that require an operator’s license for historical boilers. We want to be able to use our Minnesota license to operate in other jurisdictions that require an operator’s license, and to accept operator’s license from other jurisdictions as long as their requirements to get a license are equal to or greater than the Minnesota requirements.

As of right now we have agreement to accept the North Dakota license and North Dakota accepts the Minnesota license.

Minnesota will also accept the Manitoba license, but Manitoba has a driving requirement to get their license, so as of now the Minnesota license will not be accepted in Manitoba.

We are working with Ohio to verify that we can have reciprocity with them. One of the requirements to get an Ohio license is to attend an accepted steam school. The University of Rollag is one of the schools that is accepted by Ohio and just recently the Wisconsin steam school became an accredited school. The Minnesota Chief and the Ohio Chief are going to be working together to come to an agreement.

There is also a movement in Canada to get a common license between British Columbia, Saskatchewan, Alberta and Manitoba. If they do reach an agreement we may want to see what would need to be changed in the Minnesota license to be acceptable to them.

Are there any other jurisdictions that require an operator’s license for historical boilers that we should be looking at? I think Montana has a license but I don’t know much about it. If any of you know about the Montana license, or any other jurisdiction’s license, please pass on the information so we can see if it may be acceptable in Minnesota.

I look at this a little bit like an automobile license. You don’t need to stop at each state line and take a test to be able to operate in the next state. However, I do feel that in order to operate in Minnesota you must have a license that meets or exceeds the Minnesota requirements.

Any additional information on this would be appreciated.
 
Then only one I could think of Tom, and it may not even be an issue for us is Kentucky. We have quite a few members from Kentucky who operate in the construction area (steam shovels) but perhaps they all have Minnesota licenses.

Thanks for all of the hard work you do legislatively for the hobby. I know it has to involve a lot of your time and expense. It is appreciated.
 
Mark,
I don’t know if Kentucky has a requirement for an operator’s license for historical boilers. There are only about 15 states that require an operating license for any high pressure boiler, much less historical boilers. I am hoping that some of the community forum followers from other states will have some input as to what their jurisdictions require.

In my discussions with Joel Amato, he has expressed that there will always be a requirement for licensing in Minnesota, but he is willing to look at others states licenses as long as they meet or exceed the requirements we have. When we bring in engines from other states it would be nice if their operators could use their own license as long as it satisfies our requirements. Joel is willing to look at any other states that have a license so I want to get this information gathered up so we can get everything in place before the steaming season.

Tom
 
Montana now has a requirement for attending a steam school and to my knowledge Rollag is on that list. Something worth following up on.
 
Back
Top